An Analysis of Disability in Higher Education
A Canadian and Black Feminist Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/28169344.143Keywords:
Anti-Black Racism, Higher Education, Disability Studies in Education, Black Feminist pedagogies, Women & Gender, DisCritAbstract
In Canada, institutions of higher education are deeply rooted in colonial systems of knowledge production, institutionalized racism, and Eurocentric academic traditions. Despite the dismantling of formal legal barriers, Black disabled students continue to be marginalized by the legacies of racism and ableism embedded in academic policies, prevailing attitudes, and institutional cultures. Though there has been significant research focused on understanding the specific barriers faced by disabled students in higher education, much research is still needed on the intersecting challenges encountered by Black disabled women. This paper critically evaluates the essay Being Black and Disabled in University (Métraux, 2023) which draws on a study from Joy Banks, & Michael S. Hughes (2013), and responds to it within a Canadian context, employing a Black feminist disability studies framework. By integrating statistics and findings from the report on The Intersection of Blackness & Disability in Canada (Anderson, 2020) alongside the theoretical insights of Black feminist scholars and disability scholars, this paper foregrounds the nuanced realities of Black disabled students in higher education and advocates for systemic change so that we may implement tangible strategies to better support their experiences and academic outcomes.
References
Anderson, J. M. (2020). The intersection of Blackness & disability in Canada: A brief overview & a call to action. ÀṢẸ Community Foundation for People with Disabilities.
Baker, L. A. (2024). Navigating complexities: The intersectionality of Blackness and disability in higher education. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
Henry, F. (2017). [Review of the book: The equity myth: Racialization and Indigeneity at Canadian universities, by F. Henry, E. Dua, C. E. James, A. Kobayashi, P. Li, H. Ramos, & M. S. Smith]. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 12(2), 50–52.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister Outsider: Essays and speeches. Crossing Press.
Métraux, J. (2023, February 28). Being Black and disabled in university. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2023/02/28/black-disabled-students-face-barriers-accessing-disability-services
Mignolo, W. D. (2012). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.
Parekh, G. (2023). Ableism in education. Taylor & Francis.
Schalk, S. (2018). Bodyminds reimagined: (Dis)ability, race, and gender in Black women’s speculative fiction. Duke University Press.
Taylor, A., & Shallish, L. (2019). The logic of bio-meritocracy in the promotion of higher education equity. Disability & Society, 34(7–8), 1200–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1613962
Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Prilly Bicknell-Hersco

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), you are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.